Clashes in the Assembly

By E. Voeten. International Organization, 2000

444 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0b79047c9b5f6d4247308f5121c26de6d88c0db7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Mathias Koenig-Archibugi
2. S. Jackman
3. Joshua D. Clinton
4. Michael A. Bailey
5. E. Voeten
6. Anton Strezhnev
7. David M. Blei
8. Jeffrey B. Lewis

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Mathias Koenig-Archibugi
2. S. Jackman
3. Joshua D. Clinton
4. E. Voeten

Citations in the corpus

• Estimating Dynamic State Preferences from United Nations Voting Data (2017, background): “For example, in some years, North– South divisions over UN supranationalism pitted the powerful states (including the USSR and the United States) against developing nations (Voeten 2000).”
• The Statistical Analysis of Roll Call Data (2004, background): “…of the U.S. Congress, both contemporary and historical (e.g., Canes-Wrone, Brady, and Cogan 2002; Jenkins 1999; Schickler 2000), state legislatures (e.g., Wright and Schaffner 2002), courts (Martin and Quinn 2001), comparative politics (Londregan 2000b), and international relations (Voeten 2000).”
• Explaining Government Preferences for Institutional Change in EU Foreign and Security Policy (2004, background): “…by each government in absolute terms, but as indications of their relative location on the continuum from national sovereignty to supranational governance+ 50+ Voeten 2000, 209+ 51+ Conseil de l’Union Européenne, 2003+ 52+ Voting behavior in the UN Assembly is an imperfect indicator of the “true”…”