Analysing eco‐evolutionary dynamics—The challenging complexity of the real world
By L. De Meester, K. Brans, L. Govaert, Caroline Souffreau, Shinjini Mukherjee, Héléne Vanvelk, Konrad Korzeniowski, Laurens J. Kilsdonk, E. Decaestecker, R. Stoks and 1 more. Functional Ecology, 2019
101 citations recorded by the source corpus.
The field of eco‐evolutionary dynamics is developing rapidly, with a growing number of well‐designed experiments quantifying the impact of evolution on ecological processes and patterns, ranging from population demography to community composition and ecosystem functioning. The key challenge remains to transfer the insights of these proof‐of‐principle experiments to natural settings, where multiple species interact and the dynamics are far more complex than those studied in most experiments. Here, we discuss potential pitfalls of building a framework on eco‐evolutionary dynamics that is based on data on single species studied in isolation from interspecific interactions, which can lead to both under‐ and overestimation of the impact of evolution on ecological processes. Underestimation of evolution‐driven ecological changes could occur in a single‐species approach when the focal species is involved in co‐evolutionary dynamics, whereas overestimation might occur due to increased rates of evolution following ecological release of the focal species. In order to develop a multi‐species perspective on eco‐evolutionary dynamics, we discuss the need for a broad‐sense definition of “eco‐evolutionary feedbacks” that includes any reciprocal interaction between ecological and evolutionary processes, next to a narrow‐sense definition that refers to interactions that directly feed back on the interactor that evolves. We discuss the challenges and opportunities of using more natural settings in eco‐evolutionary studies by gradually adding complexity: (a) multiple interacting species within a guild, (b) food web interactions and (c) evolving metacommunities in multiple habitat patches in a landscape. A literature survey indicated that only a few studies on microbial systems so far developed a truly multi‐species approach in their analysis of eco‐evolutionary dynamics, and mostly so in artificially constructed communities. Finally, we provide a road map of methods to study eco‐evolutionary dynamics in more natural settings. Eco‐evolutionary studies involving multiple species are necessarily demanding and might require intensive collaboration among research teams, but are highly needed. A plain language summary is available for this article.
Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0b6493f075b6e13e3768ab805c90472837e26a0e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
In Genetics
In Sociology and Political Science
Citations in the corpus
- A critique for eco‐evolutionary dynamics (2019, background): “In reality, however, all of the species in a given community are variable and evolving—and all of those species could be influencing community structure and ecosystem function (see also De Meester et al., 2019).”