A note on Piketty and diminishing returns to capital

By Matthew Rognlie. 2014

112 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0b4fe89b4048b48dd390633086616857ec85f3ad

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Benjamin Bridgman
2. Per Krusell
3. Anthony A. Smith
4. César Sosa‐Padilla
5. Kirsten I. M. Rohde
6. Fatih Guvenen
7. Ivar Ekeland
8. Mohammed Abdellaoui

Citations in the corpus

• Is Piketty’s “Second Law of Capitalism” Fundamental? (2015, background): “We do not focus on this elasticity here, though Rognlie (2014) argues persuasively that some of Piketty’s arguments rely on an unrealistically small elasticity.”
• IS LABOR'S LOSS CAPITAL'S GAIN? GROSS VERSUS NET LABOR SHARES (2017, background): “It is a central object in the controversy over the Piketty (2014) analysis of inequality [Rognlie (2014), Acemoglu and Robinson (2015), Jones (2015), Krusell and Smith (2015)].”