Variational Methods in Imaging
By Otmar Scherzer, Markus Grasmair, H. Grossauer, Markus Haltmeier, Frank Lenzen. Applied Mathematical Sciences, 2008
602 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0b47a063fb29d2688226a289b84120661fcdc216
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Biomedical Engineering
- Peter Maass
- Otmar Scherzer
- Markus Haltmeier
- Bernd Hofmann
- Carola-Bibiane Schönlieb
- Ozan Öktem
- Simon Robert Arridge
- Stephan Antholzer
In Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
- Carola-Bibiane Schönlieb
- Gabriele Steidl
- Tanja Teuber
- Simon Setzer
- Kristian Bredies
- Thomas Pock
- Markus Haltmeier
- Ozan Öktem
Citations in the corpus
- Infimal convolution regularizations with discrete ℓ1-type functionals (2011, background): “For other generalizations of TV we refer to [31].”
- Regularization properties of the sequential discrepancy principle for Tikhonov regularization in Banach spaces (2014, background): “[5,8,9]), and summarize some mathematical consequences of those standard assumptions.”
- On the interplay of source conditions and variational inequalities for nonlinear ill-posed problems (2010, background): “38 in [1] which just handle the case 1⁄4 1.”
- Total Generalized Variation (2010, methodology): “For various other aspects on the topic of constructing appropriate regularization or filter functionals in image reconstruction, we refer the reader to [SGGHL] and the references given there.”
- Deep Neural Networks Motivated by Partial Differential Equations (2018, methodology): “ying functions. This continuous data model has led to solid mathematical theories for classical data processing tasks obtained by leveraging the rich results from PDEs and variational calculus (e.g., [38]). The continuous perspective has also enabled more abstract formulations that are independent o”
- Solving inverse problems using data-driven models (2019, methodology): “The idea here is to minimize a measure of data misfit that is penalized using a regularizer (Kaltenbacher, Neubauer and Scherzer 2008, Scherzer et al. 2009): Rθ(g) := arg min f∈X {L(A(f), g) + Sθ(f)}, (2.7) where we make use of the notation in Definitions 2.2, 2.4 and 2.5.”
- NETT: solving inverse problems with deep neural networks (2018, background): “For convex regularizers, the notion of Bregman distance is a powerful concept [8, 44].”
- An extension of the variational inequality approach for obtaining convergence rates in regularization of nonlinear ill-posed problems (2010, background): “In recent publications (see [12, 13, 16, 25]) variational inequalities of the form”
- Sparse regularization with lq penalty term (2008, methodology): “Requiring differentiability of uα , he used the square of a higher order weighted Sobolev norm as a penalty term [26, 27].”