Joint Strategy Fictitious Play with Inertia for Potential Games
By Jason R. Marden, Gürdal Arslan, Jeff S. Shamma. Proceedings of the 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, 2005
344 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management Science and Operations Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0b3ea9272fb4e0a4a82e27364264b347a2b53b6b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
In Management Science and Operations Research
- Jason R. Marden
- Jeff S. Shamma
- Gürdal Arslan
- Karl Henrik Johansson
- Dusan M. Stipanovic
- Milos S. Stankovic
- David Silver
- Johannes Heinrich
Citations in the corpus
- Autonomous Vehicle-Target Assignment: A Game-Theoretical Formulation (2007, background): “The most computationally intensive operation is the optimization of the utilities during the negotiations, which effectively requires an enumeration of all possible combined assignments by other vehicles (cid:1) 21,22 (cid:2) .”
- Cooperative Control and Potential Games (2009, background): “With the consensus problem now formulated as a potential game, there are a large number of learning algorithms available with guaranteed results [10, 18, 17, 12, 15, 16].”
- Opportunistic Spectrum Access in Cognitive Radio Networks: Global Optimization Using Local Interaction Games (2012, background): “, best response dynamic [39], [40], no-regret learning [11], [20] and fictitious play [42], [43], a main drawback is that they may converge to some suboptimal NE points.”