Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science: Internal and External Validity

By Rose McDermott. 2011

87 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Science and Operations Research, Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0b38ecaac6141f7f629892eced8e8300931d401d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. Maria Abascal
2. Yanna Krupnikov
3. A. Levine
4. Delia Baldassarri

In Safety Research

1. Maria Abascal
2. Yanna Krupnikov
3. A. Levine
4. Delia Baldassarri

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Maria Abascal
2. Yanna Krupnikov
3. A. Levine
4. Delia Baldassarri

Citations in the corpus

• Cross-Sample Comparisons and External Validity (2014, background): “Put another way, these savvier subjects heighten the artificiality of the experimental setting (McDermott 2011).”
• Field experiments across the social sciences (2017, methodology): “As we argue in the following section, generalizability is the product not of single experiments, but of replication across different populations and settings (Banerjee & Duflo 2011, McDermott 2011).”
• Gender Inequality in Deliberative Participation (2012, background): “…was conducted with non-Hispanic whites since the effects may differ for other populations; this too can be tested in future work.29 Although our study was conducted under controlled circumstances, its high internal validity is valuable despite the tradeoff with external validity (McDermott 2011).”