Visual discomfort in stereoscopic displays: a review

By Marc T. M. Lambooij, W. Ijsselsteijn, I. Heynderickx. Electronic imaging, 2007

315 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Media Technology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0b2b9e1a26d28cc8c0c54d928ea82e694c1eb82f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. A. Bovik
2. W. Ijsselsteijn
3. Jari Korhonen

In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

1. A. Bovik
2. Lawrence K. Cormack
3. Che-Chun Su
4. Ming-Jun Chen
5. Do-Kyoung Kwon
6. Zhou Wang
7. W. Ijsselsteijn
8. Anush K. Moorthy

In Media Technology

1. Lawrence K. Cormack
2. Che-Chun Su
3. Ming-Jun Chen
4. Do-Kyoung Kwon
5. A. Bovik
6. W. Ijsselsteijn
7. Zhou Wang
8. Weisi Lin

Citations in the corpus

• Full-reference quality assessment of stereopairs accounting for rivalry (2013, background): “Lambooij et al. [5] and Tam et al. [6] provide comprehensive reviews of these topics, and some general rules, such as the zone of comfortable viewing [7,8], have been proposed to predict potential visual discomfort, and to guide the production of satisfactory stereo content.”
• Measuring visual discomfort associated with 3D displays (2009, methodology): “001) and more in the post- than in the pre-measurement (F(1, 2430) = 48.”