Reducing Child Poverty with Cash Transfers: A Sure Thing?

251 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A revised inventory of Adverse Childhood Experiences. (2015, background): “This can be seen as a useful xpansion, because there are established evidence-based prevention strategies for some of these additional adversities such s peer victimization (Ttofi & Farrington, 2011) and reducing childhood poverty (Barrientos & DeJong, 2006).”
The diffusion of Conditional Cash Transfer programs in the Americas (2011, background): “…includes a cash transfer with three components: a household nutrition component, a school subsidy for each school-age child rising by grade (at the secondary school level there is a higher subsidy for girls) and an annual transfer to cover school costs (Barrientos and DeJong, 2006: 547).”
Gender Equality and Economic Growth: Is there a Win‐Win? (2013, background): “…land and other assets has positive implications for poverty reduction, fertility decline, children’s welfare and agricultural productivity (see, for instance, Barrientos and DeJong 2006; Blumberg 2005; Kabeer 2003; Quisumbing 2003) that has received most attention in international policy forums.”