Open Peer Review

By Christine L. Ferguson. Serials review, 2016

568 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Abstract In this issue of Serials Review, the Balance Point column delves into issues surrounding peer review, paying particular attention to open peer review. Beginning with some discussion of the history and development of peer review, as well as the advantages and disadvantages of traditional peer review, the column addresses open peer review (OPR) processes and the pros and cons of OPR. Topics such as the mechanisms of open peer review, faculty credit for peer review, as well as open peer review in the Library and Information Science (LIS) field are also touched on.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0b20490537185d7761e17047e638d42ed2587323

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

  1. Narges Moradtalab
  2. S. Anjum
  3. N. Aliasgharzad
  4. U. Ashraf
  5. T. Hartmann
  6. Günter Neumann
  7. H. Hussain
  8. R. Hajiboland

Citations in the corpus