Salience, relevance, and firing: a priority map for target selection.

By Jillian H. Fecteau, D. Munoz. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2006

923 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0b1d34246e14bb0506e1a9aaa274675f1e5092a4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

Citations in the corpus

Predicting visual fixations on video based on low-level visual features. (2007, neutral): “As recommended in (Fecteau & Munoz, 2006), the expression, “priority map”, (Serences & Yantis, 2006) is much more suitable to feature the results coming from eye tracking experiments.”
Visual adaptation and novelty responses in the superior colliculus (2011, methodology): “…implications for processing of a subsequent visual target for a manual or saccadic response: at separation intervals similar to those used here, the response to a subsequent target stimulus is slowed, a phenomenon referred to as ‘‘inhibition of return’’ or IOR (Klein, 2000; Fecteau & Munoz, 2006).”
Arousal-biased competition in perception and memory (2011, neutral): “As described below, bottom-up sensory influences (the waving hand in the crowd) and top–down cognitive factors such as goal relevance and expectations (the search for a blond-haired friend) can independently determine priority (for a review, see Fecteau & Munoz, 2006).”
RULES OF COMPETITIVE STIMULUS SELECTION IN A CHOLINERGIC ISTHMIC NUCLEUS OF THE OWL MIDBRAIN (2011, neutral): “A midbrain network plays an essential role in selecting the next stimulus for gaze and attention (Carello and Krauzlis, 2004; McPeek and Keller, 2004; Fecteau and Munoz, 2006).”
Visual search: a retrospective. (2011, background): “All four areas, FEF (Thompson & Bichot, 2005), LIP (Bisley & Goldberg, 2010; Gottlieb et al., 1998), SC (Fecteau & Munoz, 2006), and V4 (Mazer & Gallant, 2003), have been proposed as a priority map 7 with the maximum activity indicating the destination of the next saccade and possibly the ﬁnal…”
Attention, Intention, and Priority in the Parietal Lobe (2010, neutral): “Using the term priority map (Bisley et al. 2009, Fecteau & Munoz 2006, Ipata et al. 2009, Serences & Yantis 2006) implies that both bottom-up and top-down influences play a major role in the selection of objects for eye movements and attention.”
Eye guidance in natural vision: Reinterpreting salience (2011, neutral): “The notion of an attention priority map that integrates low-level and highlevel cues has been suggested several times in the neurophysiological literature (Fecteau & Munoz, 2006).”
Phantom percepts: Tinnitus and pain as persisting aversive memory networks (2011, background): “, when the stimuli are salient (4, 57), meaning behaviorally relevant or functionally significant (58).”
A multisensory investigation of the functional significance of the "pain matrix" (2011, neutral): “Therefore, the saliency of a stimulus is not determined by a particular feature of the stimulus but by how much each of its different features contrast with the surrounding (Fecteau and Munoz, 2006; Itti and Koch, 2001; Knudsen, 2007; Yantis, 2008).”