Reference cycles: the NBER methodology revisited
By M. Forni, Marc Hallin, Marco Lippi, L. Reichlin. 2000
61 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0af360239e7e6f7830368b87e287a26b47161ab1
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Jushan Bai
- Serena Ng
- George Kapetanios
- Massimiliano Marcellino
- Jianqing Fan
- James H. Stock
- Liangjun Su
- M. Forni
Citations in the corpus
- Determining the Number of Factors in Approximate Factor Models (2000, background): “Forni et al. (2000a) and Stock and Watson (1998) considered the method for large T .”
- Estimating cross-section common stochastic trends in nonstationary panel data (2004, methodology): “Consequently, factor models are used in studying world business cycles as in Gregory and Head (1999), and area-wide business cycles as in Forni and Reichlin (1998) and Forni et al. (2000b).”
- A parametric estimation method for dynamic factor models of large dimensions (2009, methodology): “…of Chamberlain and Rotschild (1983), the subsequent literature has constrained the idiosyncratic errors non-parametrically, by imposing moment restrictions and/or constraints on the eigenvalues of their variance–covariance matrix (see, e.g. Stock and Watson, 2001, 2002 or Forni et al., 1999, 2000).”
- On estimation of the noise variance in high dimensional probabilistic principal component analysis (2013, background): “In financial econometrics, it is commonly believed that the variations in a large number of economic variables can be modelled by a small number of reference variables (Forni et al., 2000; Bai and Ng, 2002; Bai, 2003).”