Paleolithic Technology and Human Evolution
By Stanley H. Ambrose. Science, 2001
725 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Anthropology, Cultural Studies, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0af10d8c2c3162f32aa2dbaaf733455789debd56
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Anthropology
- Erle C. Ellis
- Frederick L. Coolidge
- Scott H. Johnson-Frey
- E. Bruner
- C. Henshilwood
- M. Vanhaeren
- K. V. van Niekerk
- Karenleigh A. Overmann
In Cultural Studies
- Erle C. Ellis
- Frederick L. Coolidge
- Scott H. Johnson-Frey
- E. Bruner
- Karenleigh A. Overmann
- T. Wynn
- Francesco d'Errico
- C. Henshilwood
In Social Psychology
- Erle C. Ellis
- Frederick L. Coolidge
- Scott H. Johnson-Frey
- E. Bruner
- T. Wynn
- Karenleigh A. Overmann
- Stanley H. Ambrose
- Francesco d'Errico
Citations in the corpus
- Numerosity, Abstraction, and the Emergence of Symbolic Thinking (2012, background): “Using this record, we speculated that this parietal area was perhaps present in Homo erectus, to whom the Acheulian in- dustrial complex has been attributed (Ambrose 2001).”
- Coevolution of Composite‐Tool Technology, Constructive Memory, and Language (2010, background): “Conversely, the MP and the MSA are characterized by additive multicomponent composite-tool technologies (Ambrose 2001).”
- Working Memory, its Executive Functions, and the Emergence of Modern Thinking (2005, background): “Ambrose (2001) hypothesized that the beginnings of composite tool-making, about 300,000 years ago, reflected an increase in cognitive capacity.”
- Ecology in an anthropogenic biosphere (2015, background): “3, highlighting that control of fire, meat-eating, rudimentary cooking, and the manufacture of stone tools were already established cultural traits of multiple hominin species long before the emergence of our species (Ambrose 2001, Antón et al. 2014).”
- The neural bases of complex tool use in humans. (2004, background): “A fundamental question in human evolution concerns the relationship between phylogenetic changes in the brain and the development of hominid tool manufacture and use [ 3 ].”
- Nassarius kraussianus shell beads from Blombos Cave: evidence for symbolic behaviour in the Middle Stone Age. (2005, background): “…(Yellen et al., 1995; McBrearty & Brooks, 2000; Henshilwood et al., 2001a,b, 2002) have been rejected as clear-cut evidence for behavioural modernity on the grounds of context, dating and/or because deliberate symbolic intent could not be warranted (Wadley, 2001, 2003; Klein, 2000; Ambrose, 2001).”
- API-Bank: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Tool-Augmented LLMs (2023, background): “Traditionally, tool usage has been viewed as a uniquely human behavior, with its emergence considered a significant mile-stone in primate evolution (Ambrose, 2001).”
- Morphological Differences in the Parietal Lobes within the Human Genus (2010, background): “…sure, the capability to organize the external reality within a personal framework through “virtual” handling of its parts is a requisite needed to dissect a final target into subgoals (Beaman 2010) or to evolve a conjunctive/additive technology from a reductive/subtractive approach (Ambrose 2001).”