You May Believe You Are a Bayesian But You Are Probably Wrong

By S. Senn. 2011

62 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0ae800a313e9fd2a52e483d6a4854fe6b147e061

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Valentin Amrhein
2. David Trafimow
3. Sander Greenland
4. Judea Pearl
5. Tyler J. VanderWeele
6. Thomas S. Richardson
7. T. Lash
8. P. Cummings

Citations in the corpus

• Inferential Statistics as Descriptive Statistics: There Is No Replication Crisis if We Don’t Expect Replication (2018, background): “next, there is no substitute for accepting methodologic diversity (Good 1957; Cox 1978; Box 1980; Barnard 1996; Little 2006; Senn 2011; Efron and Hastie 2016; Crane 2017), with careful assessment of uncertainty as the core motivation for statistical practice (e.”