The value of trees, water and open space as reflected by house prices in the Netherlands
By J. Luttik. 2000
760 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0ae72b54a3a9b21863156b4640a2863c4375a0ee
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Stephen Polasky
- Heather A. Sander
- A. V. D. Berg
- D. A. Conway
- Christoph Kahle
- Jeanne Dachary-Bernard
- Steven M. Manson
- T. Tan
In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
- Jeanne Dachary-Bernard
- T. Tan
- Subhrendu K. Pattanayak
- A. V. D. Berg
- Marius Thériault
- François Des Rosiers
- Leandro García Menéndez
- S. D. S. Salazar
Citations in the corpus
- A hedonic valuation of urban green areas (2003, methodology): “As far as urban planning is concerned, some recent applications of the method have focused on the analysis of school districts (Clark and Herrin, 2000), the existence of open spaces (Luttik, 2000), urban wetlands (Mahan et al.”
- Land-use planning and public preferences: What can we learn from choice experiment method? (2007, methodology): “For example, the hedonic pricing method uses the price variations on real estate markets to infer economic values of landscape changes (Luttik, 2000) (Cavailhès et al.”
- Shades of Green: Measuring the Value of Urban Forests in the Housing Market (2005, background): “Some research has focused primarily on distance to public forests (see Tyrvainen and Miettinen, 2000; More et al., 1988; Luttik, 2000).”
- Estimating the non-market benefits of an urban park: Does proximity matter? (2007, methodology): “…in residential property values applying the hedonic pricing methodology (see, for example, Hobden et al., 2004; Bengochea, 2003; Geoghegan, 2002; Din et al., 2001; Bolitzer and Netusil, 2000; Luttik, 2000; Tyrväinen, 1997; Tyrväinen and Meittinen, 2000; Powe et al., 1995; Palmquist, 1992).”
- The Amenity Value of English Nature: A Hedonic Price Approach (2014, neutral): “views (Benson et al., 1998; Patterson & Boyle, 2002 ; Luttik, 2000; Morancho, 2003), urban trees (Anderson and Cordell, 1985; Morales, 1 980; Morales, Micha, and Weber,”
- Environmental preference and restoration: (How) are they related? (2003, background): “People’s preference for natural over built environments can also be inferred from behavioral indicators, such as the higher prices paid for real estate in natural surroundings (e.g. Anderson & Cordell, 1988; Luttik, 2000).”
- A Spatial Autocorrelation Approach for Examining the Effects of Urban Greenspace on Residential Property Values (2010, background): “Luttik (2000) estimated not only the value of trees, but also of water and immediate open space in eight towns or regions in the Netherlands through a hedonic model.”
- How Do You Measure Distance in Spatial Models? An Example Using Open-Space Valuation (2010, background): “These open spaces offer amenities, such as scenic views and outdoor recreation, for which value is capitalized in the purchase prices of homes (eg Anderson and West, 2006; Bolitzer and Netusil, 2000; Geoghegan, 2002; Irwin, 2002; Kong et al, 2007; Luttik, 2000; Lutzenhiser and Netusil, 2001).”
- Landscape amenities and local development: a review of migration, regional economic and hedonic pricing studies (2010, methodology): “Positive effects were found for urban forests (Luttik, 2000; Mansfield et al., 2005; Netusil, 2005; Poudyal et al., 2009; Tyrväinen and Miettinen, 2000) or forest preserves (Thorsnes, 2002).”
- Meeting first-time buyers’ housing needs and preferences in greater Kuala Lumpur (2012, background): “Also, studies from the European (Luttik, 2000) and North American (Tajima, 2003) countries have proven that households are willing to pay more for garden and green space.”