The wizards of deception detection.

By Maureen O’Sullivan, Paul Ekman. 2004

149 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Information Systems, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0ae4b1a316932b169bd8773715a572e55046d286

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Aldert Vrij
2. Pär Anders Granhag
3. Maria Hartwig
4. R. Fisher
5. Leanne ten Brinke
6. S. Porter
7. Leif A. Strömwall
8. H. Blank

In Information Systems

1. Aldert Vrij
2. Pär Anders Granhag

In Social Psychology

1. Aldert Vrij
2. Pär Anders Granhag
3. Maria Hartwig
4. R. Fisher
5. S. Porter
6. Leanne ten Brinke
7. Leif A. Strömwall
8. Sharon Leal

Citations in the corpus

• Eliciting cues to deception and truth: What matters are the questions asked (2012, background): “…not be there nd are unlikely to be found, such as examining whether some peole are better than others at lie detection (O’Sullivan, 2005, 2007, 008; O’Sullivan & Ekman, 2004), whether people become better ie detectors if they are taught to pay attention to some specific ues (Bull, 2004; Driskell,…”