Bending of Euler–Bernoulli beams using Eringen’s integral formulation: A paradox resolved

By J. Fernández-Sáez, Ramón Zaera, Jose Antonio Loya, J. Reddy. 2016

463 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Abstract The Eringen nonlocal theory of elasticity formulated in differential form has been widely used to address problems in which size effect cannot be disregarded in micro- and nano-structured solids and nano-structures. However, this formulation shows some inconsistencies that are not completely understood. In this paper we formulate the problem of the static bending of Euler–Bernoulli beams using the Eringen integral constitutive equation. It is shown that, in general, the Eringen model in differential form is not equivalent to the Eringen model in integral form, and a general method to solve the problem rigorously in integral form is proposed. Beams with different boundary and load conditions are analyzed and the results are compared with those derived from the differential approach showing that they are different in general. With this integral formulation, the paradox that appears when solving the cantilever beam with the differential form of the Eringen model (increase in stiffness with the nonlocal parameter) is solved, which is one of the main contributions of the present work.

Subfields: Materials Chemistry, Mechanics of Materials

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0ae23c4af28cd4b2befe7bce04f65da06ed741be

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Materials Chemistry

  1. Ali Farajpour
  2. Mergen H. Ghayesh
  3. Hamed Farokhi
  4. Raffaele Barretta
  5. Raimondo Luciano
  6. F. D. Sciarra
  7. Marko Canadija
  8. Zheng Ma

In Mechanics of Materials

  1. Ali Farajpour
  2. Mergen H. Ghayesh
  3. Hamed Farokhi
  4. Raimondo Luciano
  5. Raffaele Barretta
  6. F. D. Sciarra
  7. Marko Canadija
  8. Zheng Ma

Citations in the corpus