Corn and soybean response to rotation sequence, row spacing, and tillage system

168 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Growth and Yield Responses of Soybean to Row Spacing and Seeding Rate (2011, background): “In a 4-yr study in southern Wisconsin (Pedersen and Lauer, 2003), average yields did not diff er among the three row spacings, but an interaction with years was observed with soybean in 0.”
Maize grain yield responses to plant height variability resulting from crop rotation and tillage system in a long-term experiment (2010, result): “Comparatively lower yields in MM–NT environments have been widely documented in other similar studies across themidwestern United States (e.g., Moncrief et al., 1991; Pederson and Lauer, 2003).”
Tillage and crop rotation impact on soybean grain yield and composition (2006, background): “According to Pedersen and Lauer (2003) , SCN was first identified in this trial in 2001.”
Tillage and Crop Rotation Effects on Corn Agronomic Response and Economic Return at Seven Iowa Locations (2015, unknown): “, 2013), and other conventional tillage systems in Wisconsin (Pedersen and Lauer, 2003) and Indiana (Griffith et al.”
Temporal Yield Variability under Conventional and Alternative Management Systems (2007, result): “Row spacing and cultivation frequency also differed between the LI and CT, and these practices have been shown to affect row crop yields in previous studies (Zhang et al., 1996; Pedersen and Lauer, 2003).”