Stanford typed dependencies manual
By Marie-Catherine de Marnee, Christopher D. Manning. 2010
793 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Information Extraction, Computational Linguistics & Semantics
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Information Extraction
- Yuan Luo
- Peter Szolovits
- Dipanjan Das
- Zhiyong Lu
- Kuzman Ganchev
- Sérgio Nunes
- Jason Aaron Edward Weston
- Timothy Baldwin
In Computational Linguistics & Semantics
- Anoop Kunchukuttan
- Dipanjan Das
- Zhiyong Lu
- Kuzman Ganchev
- Sérgio Nunes
- Jason Aaron Edward Weston
- Timothy Baldwin
- Pushpak Bhattacharyya
Citations in the corpus
- ChestX-Ray8: Hospital-Scale Chest X-Ray Database and Benchmarks on Weakly-Supervised Classification and Localization of Common Thorax Diseases (2017, methodology): “The syntactic dependencies are then obtained from “CCProcessed” dependencies output by applying Stanford dependencies converter [8] on the parse tree.”
- Automatic lymphoma classification with sentence subgraph mining from pathology reports. (2014, methodology): “We also chose the mode having “collapsed dependencies with propagation of conjunct dependencies” [43], which has the most compact graph translations.”
- Annotated Gigaword (2012, background): “See de Marneffe and Manning (2008) for details.”
- Semantic Frame Identification with Distributed Word Representations (2014, methodology): “…our PropBank and FrameNet training, development and test corpora with a shift-reduce dependency parser that uses the Stanford conventions (de Marneffe and Manning, 2013) and uses an arc-eager transition system with beam size of 8; the parser and its features are described by Zhang and Nivre…”