Sexual Selection in Males and Females

By T. H. Clutton-Brock. Science, 2007

895 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0acdd68568f7d3fed9f41c34ad74ca2428cb3ce0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Genetics

Citations in the corpus

High river temperature reduces survival of sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) approaching spawning grounds and exacerbates female mortality (2012, background): “The reduced proportions of spawning females could create more intense competition between males for access to females, thus increasing the variance in reproductive success and stronger sexual selection among males (Kvarnemo and Ahnesjö 1996; Clutton-Brock 2007).”
Female–female aggression around mating: an extra cost of sociality in a multimale primate society (2011, background): “Female intrasexual competition over reproduction appears to occur where the resources necessary for successful reproduction are limited (Clutton-Brock 2007, 2009; Stockley and Bro-Jorgensen 2011), specifically 1) the food or breeding territories necessary for successful pregnancy and weaning, 2)…”
Life History and Population Dynamics of Green Crabs (Carcinus maenas) (2019, background): “Within continental Europe, the COI data supported weak but significant differentiation between crabs from northern Europe (Norway, Sweden, Finland, Denmark, Germany, and Poland) and those from southwestern Europe (the Netherlands, Belgium, France, Spain and Portugal [11].”
Social competition and its consequences in female mammals (2013, background): “resources and for access to feeding territories (Clutton-Brock 2007), and survival is 90”
The evolution and evolutionary consequences of social plasticity in mate preferences (2013, neutral): “…milieu inwhich conspecifics, heterospecifics, natural enemies and the choosing individual’s own characteristics all influence the context and outcomes of reproductive decisions (West-Eberhard 1983; Zuk & Kolluru 1998; Greenfield 2002; Costa 2006; Clutton-Brock 2007; Lyon & Montgomerie 2012).”
Parental investment, sexual selection and sex ratios (2008, background): “Obviously, once sex differences evolve, selection can become sex-specific in numerous qualitative as well as quantitative ways (Clutton-Brock, 2007).”
Perceived mate availability influences intrasexual competition, jealousy and mate-guarding behavior (2014, background): “…to compete intrasexually in order to attain and guard desirable mates (e.g., ARNOCKY, SUNDERANI and VAILLANCOURT 2013; ARNOCKY et al. 2012; ARNOCKY and VAILLANCOURT 2012; BUSS and SHACKELFORD 1997; CAMPBELL 1995; CLUTTON-BROCK 2007; SUNDERANI, ARNOCKY and VAILLANCOURT 2013; VAILLANCOURT 2005).”
A Guide to Sexual Selection Theory (2012, background): “The focus on female choice within many models denies the observed variation in choosiness between the different sexes that exists across taxa; this varies from exclusive female choice to male or mutual choice (Clutton-Brock 2007).”
Sexual selection on aggressiveness in females: evidence from an experimental test with tree swallows (2008, neutral): “Much less is understood, however, about the evolution of conspicuous female displays, ornaments and behaviours (Clutton-Brock 2007).”
Spermatogenesis in fish. (2010, background): “ciently removed, and advantageous ones rapidly fixed in a population (Clutton-Brock, 2007; Siller, 2001).”
Sexual selection in females (2009, background): “The presence of secondary sexual characters in females raises important questions about the evolutionary mechanisms responsible for them and for their distribution (Isaac 2005; Clutton-Brock 2007; Kraaijeveld et al. 2007).”