The Impact of Driver Inattention on Near-Crash/Crash Risk: An Analysis Using the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study Data

By S. Klauer, T. Dingus, V. Neale, Jeremy D Sudweeks, David J. Ramsey. 2006

701 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0aba1c07d700057153748ec60d5e98a182cb4ed8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

In Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality

Citations in the corpus

Presenting system uncertainty in automotive UIs for supporting trust calibration in autonomous driving (2013, background): “In addition to the proportion of the total time spent on looking at other things than the road ahead, the number of times drivers looked away for more than 2 seconds were counted, since this is regarded as the limit for how long a driver can look away while maintaining awareness of the situation ahe”
Driver performance effects of simultaneous visual and cognitive distraction and adaptation behavior (2012, background): “…the behavior of 100 drivers in a naturalistic environment showed that 78% of crashes (n = 100) and 65% of near-crashes (n = 100) involved some form of driver inattention , among which distraction by in-vehicle infotainment systems accounted for approximately 25% of all events (Klauer et al., 2006).”
Did you see the unicycling clown? Inattentional blindness while walking and talking on a cell phone (2009, background): “Similarly, Klauer et al. (2006) reported that a passenger in the adjacent seat decreased accident rates whereas a cell phone conversation increased accident rates.”
The link between fatigue and safety. (2011, background): “In the U.S., volunteer rivers drove 100 instrumented vehicles (either their own or a vehile loaned to them by the project) over a period of 12–13 months, ielding 43,000 h of driving data, including video of their faces as ell as of the forward roadway (Klauer et al., 2006a,b).”
The Effects of Text Messaging on Young Drivers (2009, background): “8 times and that this increased crash risk is significantly greater than that of conversing on a cell phone while driving (Klauer et al., 2006).”
Driver Distraction in Commercial Vehicle Operations (2009, methodology): “The 100-Car Study gathered a great deal of useful data because of the continuous, naturalistic data-collection method study; however, naturalistic CMV data, rather than light-vehicle data, were used.”
Driver Inattention Monitoring System for Intelligent Vehicles: A Review (2009, background): “[112] defined the following three categories of secondary tasks: 1) complex tasks; 2) moderate tasks; and 3) simple tasks.”
An Analysis of Driver Inattention Using a Case-Crossover Approach On 100-Car Data: Final Report (2010, background): “These tasks were also found to have a higher associated risk in Klauer et al. (2006) .”