Quantitative methods for estimating the economic value of resource use to rural households.

By W. Cavendish. 2002

222 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Agronomy and Crop Science, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0aa9fb495fd70d74c59d199664f897e926e3492c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Agronomy and Crop Science

In General Agricultural and Biological Sciences

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

The importance of dry woodlands and forests in rural livelihoods and poverty alleviation in South Africa (2007, unknown): “…demonstrated that it is generally the poorest households who are most directly reliant on non-timber forest products (NTFPs) for both subsistence and cash income (Clarke et al., 1996, Campbell et al., 1997, Qureshi and Kumar, 1998, Cavendish, 2000, Neumann and Hirsch, 2000 and Cavendish, 2002).”
Forest Incomes and Poverty Alleviation Under Participatory Forest Management in the Bale Highlands, Southern Ethiopia (2010, methodology): “activities, and the access to these that together determine the living gained by a household (Ellis 2000). Five types of livelihood assets are identified in the Framework used by DFID (2001) – human, natural, physical, social, and financial capital.”
Valuation methods for environmental benefits in forestry and watershed investment projects. (2004, unknown): “Many forest valuation studies have been done over the past years (Bann, 1997; Gregersen et al., 1995; Kengen, 1997) although rigorous quantitative studies (Cavendish, 2000, 2002; Campbell et al., 2002; Fisher, 2002) are only recent and very rare (Angelsen and Wunder, 2003).”
Managing the Miombo Woodlands of Southern Africa: Policies, Incentives and Options for the Rural Poor (2010, unknown): “In the Zimbabwe studies, woodlands contributed about 15 percent of total income (Cavendish 2002; Campbell et al. 2002), but this figure was greater than 50”
Monetary accounting of ecosystem services: a test case for Limburg province, the Netherlands. (2015, result): “In addition, while capital gains from ES are sometimes included in calculations of resource rent (e.g. Cavendish, 2002), we excluded this in order to be consistent with SNA principles.”
Household livelihoods in semi-arid regions: options and constraints (2002, methodology): “The value of natural resources as a component of livelihoods is undeniable (e.g., Cavendish 2002b), but this does not imply that natural resources will provide the means to poverty alleviation.”
Quantifying rural livelihood strategies in developing countries using an activity choice approach (2013, background): “Net income is inclusive of households’ own labor input because household labor allocation into different activities is difficult to disaggregate—only for wage employment is labor allocation estimated (Babulo et al., 2008; Cavendish, 2002; Kamanga et al., 2009).”
Not just minor forest products: The economic rationale for the consumption of wild food plants by subsistence farmers (2006, background): “Therefore they might not take the same care in evaluating NTFPs as they would with marketed goods, such as crops or livestock (Cavendish, 2002: 44).”