SATABS: SAT-Based Predicate Abstraction for ANSI-C
By Edmund M. Clarke, Daniel Kroening, Natasha Sharygina, Karen Yorav. International Conference on Tools and Algorithms for Construction and Analysis of Systems, 2005
307 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computational Theory and Mathematics, Hardware and Architecture, Software
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0a951a77c4c5b96d48e96c4c82c3397c5bba187c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computational Theory and Mathematics
- Kenneth L. McMillan
- Ranjit Jhala
- Rupak Majumdar
- Dirk Beyer
- Thomas A. Henzinger
- M. Erkan Keremoglu
- Hongseok Yang
- Sanjit A. Seshia
In Hardware and Architecture
In Software
- Kenneth L. McMillan
- Rupak Majumdar
- Ranjit Jhala
- Dirk Beyer
- Thomas A. Henzinger
- M. Erkan Keremoglu
- Hongseok Yang
- Aaron R. Bradley
Citations in the corpus
- CPAchecker: A Tool for Configurable Software Verification (2009, methodology): “The advantage of the new tool over tools that implement a separated abstract-check-refine loop, like Slam [1] and SATabs [ 8 ], is that the on-the-fly approach allows the design of more flexible, and more efficient, algorithms (like ABE [5]).”
- The software model checker Blast (2007, methodology): “Implementations of CEGAR include Slam, Blast, Magic, Moped, SatAbs, and F- Soft [4,17,23,33,54].”
- Lazy Abstraction with Interpolants (2006, methodology): “This reduction was done using a modified version of the SATABS infrastructure [4].”