What Makes Multimodal Learning Better than Single (Provably)

By Yu Huang, Chenzhuang Du, Zihui Xue, Xuanyao Chen, Hang Zhao. Neural Information Processing Systems, 2021

383 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The world provides us with data of multiple modalities. Intuitively, models fusing data from different modalities outperform their uni-modal counterparts, since more information is aggregated. Recently, joining the success of deep learning, there is an influential line of work on deep multi-modal learning, which has remarkable empirical results on various applications. However, theoretical justifications in this field are notably lacking. Can multi-modal learning provably perform better than uni-modal? In this paper, we answer this question under a most popular multi-modal fusion framework, which firstly encodes features from different modalities into a common latent space and seamlessly maps the latent representations into the task space. We prove that learning with multiple modalities achieves a smaller population risk than only using its subset of modalities. The main intuition is that the former has a more accurate estimate of the latent space representation. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first theoretical treatment to capture important qualitative phenomena observed in real multi-modal applications from the generalization perspective. Combining with experiment results, we show that multi-modal learning does possess an appealing formal guarantee.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0a60746d598bae9f0ce6f25f68f4fcf668a9f13b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Yunchao Wei
  2. Xiaodan Liang
  3. Ji Qi
  4. Haifeng Li
  5. Xiao Dong
  6. Xunlin Zhan
  7. Xiaoyong Wei
  8. Minlong Lu

In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

  1. Yunchao Wei
  2. Xiaodan Liang
  3. Ji Qi
  4. Haifeng Li
  5. Xiao Dong
  6. Xunlin Zhan
  7. Xiaoyong Wei
  8. Minlong Lu

Citations in the corpus