Reflective Interviewing: A Guide to Theory and Practice

By K. Roulston. 2010

1,088 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0a5963893bb607f9795a83f49990903a5aefd77c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

Citations in the corpus

Reconceptualizing Bias in Teaching Qualitative Research Methods (2015, background): “Bracketing interviews in which researchers explain the impetus for their research interests may assist in unpacking assumptions about topics and a priori commitments (Roulston, 2010b).”
Defining and characterizing team resilience in elite sport (2013, methodology): “…some scholars have opposed the development of unvarying universal 19 standards for qualitative research (cf. Sparkes & Smith, 2009), it is important to assess the 20 quality of a study using evaluative criteria most appropriate for the research question and 21 emergent data (Roulston, 2010a).”
Participants’ experiences of the qualitative interview: considering the importance of research paradigms (2015, background): “Roulston (2010b) points out there is often considerable overlap between orientations and suggests they are most useful as heuristic devices for novice researchers to become familiar with different ways of doing interviews.”
Intimacy, rapport, and exceptional disclosure: a comparison of in-person and mediated interview contexts (2018, methodology): “Numerous qualitative interview method texts note the importance of interview location and context (Edwards & Holland, 2013; Gubrium, Holstein, Marvasti, & McKinney, 2012; Kvale & Brinkmann, 2008; Mishler, 2009; Roulston, 2010).”
Skype as a Tool for Qualitative Research Interviews (2016, methodology): “2009; Kozinets 2009); blogs analysis (Hookway 2008; Rettberg 2008); Facebook as a research tool and source of data (Baker 2013; Baltar & Brunet 2012; Brickman Bhutta 2012; Taylor et al.”