Integrated Process Modeling: An Ontological Evaluation

By Peter F. Green, Michael Rosemann. Information Systems, 2000

324 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Information Systems, Management Information Systems

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0a493040b220002ecedf29365ca9613ce75fcef9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Information Systems

1. J. Recker
2. Marta Indulska
3. Peter F. Green
4. Michael Rosemann
5. Steven L. Alter
6. Jan Mendling
7. Wil M.P. van der Aalst

In Management Information Systems

1. J. Recker
2. Marta Indulska
3. Peter F. Green
4. Michael Rosemann
5. Yair Wand
6. Ron Weber
7. Steven L. Alter
8. Jan Mendling

Citations in the corpus

• Research Commentary: Information Systems and Conceptual Modeling - A Research Agenda (2002, background): “For example, Green and Rosemann (2000) have evaluated Scheer’s (1999) Architecture of Integrated Processes, which forms the basis for the ARIS Toolset 4.1, a CASE tool with over 14,000 licences worldwide.”
• Business Process Modeling- A Comparative Analysis (2009, methodology): “Green and Rosemann (2000) used the BWW model to analyze the Event-driven Process Chain (EPC) notation (Scheer, 2000), assessing both ontological completeness and clarity.”
• Opportunities and constraints: the current struggle with BPMN (2010, methodology): “This mode of investigation is known as a representational analysis and is a widely used tool in research on process modeling ( Green and Rosemann, 2000”