Attachment style and two forms of affect coregulation between romantic partners
By Jonathan E. Butner, L. Diamond, Angela M. Hicks. 2007
147 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Demography, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0a44be4fdd7bb95146c4331365ee4375b1a70d58
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
In Demography
In Social Psychology
Citations in the corpus
- An upward spiral: Bidirectional associations between positive affect and positive aspects of close relationships across the life span (2015, background): “…C, Daily 166 dyads W: M = 44.2, SD = 4.8 M: M = 46.2, SD = 5.3 PA coregulation Associations between husband and wife PA State PA Two selfreport items of momentary PA – – Butner et al. (2007) STL, C, Daily 48 dyads 20–52 (M = 27, SD = 7) PA coregulation Covariation in state PA State PA…”
- Interpersonal Emotion Regulation in the Workplace: A Conceptual and Operational Review and Future Research Agenda (2018, unknown): “Emotional coregulation has emerged primarily from the adult close relationship literature (Butner et al. 2007; Saxbe and Repetti 2010; Sbarra and Hazan 2008; Totenhagen et al. 2016).”
- Emotional Coregulation in Close Relationships (2013, methodology): “The statistical models suggested by Boker, Butner, and colleagues could be adapted to address all these issues (Boker & Laurenceau, 2006, 2007; Boker & Nesselroade, 2002; Butner, Amazeen, & Mulvey, 2005; Butner et al., 2007).”