Species 2000 & ITIS Catalogue of Life

By F. Bisby, Y. Roskov, Thomas M. Orrell, D. Nicolson, L. Paglinawan, N. Bailly, P. Kirk, T. Bourgoin, G. Baillargeon, D. Ouvrard. 2010

425 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Larger pollinators deposit more pollen on stigmas across multiple plant species—A meta‐analysis (2020, methodology): “We calculated Rosenthal's fail-safe number to estimate the number of unpublished studies, which would erase the significant effect measured by the meta-analysis (Rosenberg, 2005).”
Phylogenetic analysis and a time tree for a large drosophilid data set (Diptera: Drosophilidae) (2013, methodology): “For species not included in TaxoDros, we considered the taxonomic assignments given in GenBank and other sources (Wang et al., 2006, Yassin et al. 2008, Bisby et al., 2012).”
A large phylogeny of turtles (Testudines) using molecular data (2012, methodology): “Taxonomic sampling and molecular data Species sampling was made according to the nomenclature described by Bisby et al. (2009).”
The PREDICTS database: a global database of how local terrestrial biodiversity responds to human impacts (2014, methodology): “We therefore matched taxonomic names to the Catalogue of Life 2013 Annual Checklist (Roskov et al. 2013, henceforth COL).”
SILVA, RDP, Greengenes, NCBI and OTT — how do these taxonomies compare? (2017, methodology): “It is manually curated based on current systematic literature, and uses over 150 sources, for example, the Catalog of Life [23], the Encyclopedia of Life [24], Name-Bank [25] and WikiSpecies [26] as well as some specific databases dedicated to particular groups of organisms.”