The dragonfly delusion: why it is essential to sample exuviae to avoid biased surveys

By Eva M. Raebel, T. Merckx, P. Riordan, David W. Macdonald, David J. Thompson. Journal of Insect Conservation, 2010

150 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0a1feb30b9fe1a697e5b81cf945113f1d8c1d4e1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. W. Foster
2. R. Dow
3. Thomas E. Kutcher
4. D. Aldridge
5. Jason T. Bried
6. Edgar C. Turner

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. W. Foster
2. Thomas E. Kutcher
3. D. Aldridge
4. Jason T. Bried
5. Edgar C. Turner

Citations in the corpus

• Adult Odonata conservatism as an indicator of freshwater wetland condition (2014, background): “This supports the fact that much adult donate activity and abundance is localized in and around breeding abitat (Bried and Ervin, 2006; Butler and deMaynadier, 2008), and ndermines the prevailing opinion that adult stages cannot indicate onditions at the breeding site (Raebel et al., 2010).”
• The impacts of habitat disturbance on adult and larval dragonflies (Odonata) in rainforest streams in Sabah, Malaysian Borneo (2017, background): “…of exuviae would also be highly desirable to be sure that species are successfully completing their lifecycle at a site (Cordoba-Aguiler, 2008; Raebel et al., 2010), but it is recognised that exuviae can be challenging to survey, and so can often under-estimate richness (CordobaAguiler, 2008;…”