News as Discourse

By T. V. Dijk. 1990

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Sciences & Humanities

Citations in the corpus

Towards Coherent and Cohesive Long-form Text Generation (2018, background): “…and other forms of coherence and cohesion relations and their quantiﬁ-cation (Edmundson, 1969; Halliday and Hasan, 1976; Hobbs, 1985; McKeown, 1985; Cohen and Levesque, 1985; Hovy, 1988; Liddy, 1991; Hovy, 1991; Mani et al., 1998; Cristea et al., 1998; Barzi-lay and Lapata, 2008; Van Dijk, 2013).”
Cultural Circuits of Climate Change in U.K. Broadsheet Newspapers, 1985–2003 (2005, background): “…to deconstruct the discursive rules in play (Burgess, 1985, 1990; Myerson & Rydin, 1996; van Leeuwen & Jewitt, 2001) and their rhetorical functions such as how linguistic texts and visual images seek to persuade audiences of their facticity or truthfulness (van Dijk, 1988; Fairclough, 1995).”
A model of trust-repair discourse (2014, background): “Through the MA NU SC RI PT interplay between evaluative language and factual information, the superlativeness (Bednarek and Caple, 2012) of the response is brought to the fore.”
Weblogs and the Epistemology of the News: Some Trends in Online Journalism (2004, background): “While most news texts are the result of the processing and editing of other texts (Bell, 1991; van Dijk, 1988), they are constructed within a set of conventions that aim for ‘a unified text which conceals the editor’s intervention’ (Bell, 1991: 51).”
Which Side are You on? Identifying Perspectives at the Document and Sentence Levels (2006, background): “There has been research in discourse analysis that examines how different perspectives are expressed in political discourse (van Dijk, 1988; Pan et al., 1999; Geis, 1987).”