Relevance of methodological choices for accounting of land use change carbon fluxes
By Eberhard Hansis, J. Pongratz. 2015
220 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0a00e4f278aaf6897824452ea5d3d512b49719be
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Atmospheric Science
- Johann Jungclaus
- Jochem Marotzke
- Holger Pohlmann
- Helmuth Haak
- Klaus Hubacek
- T. Mauritsen
- Jin-Song von Storch
- M. Esch
In Global and Planetary Change
- Jochem Marotzke
- Johann Jungclaus
- Helmuth Haak
- Holger Pohlmann
- M. Esch
- Klaus Hubacek
- T. Mauritsen
- Jin-Song von Storch
Citations in the corpus
- Developments in the MPI‐M Earth System Model version 1.2 (MPI‐ESM1.2) and Its Response to Increasing CO2 (2019, methodology): “The other 70% of the wood harvest is distributed to the three wood harvest pools according to the values assumed in the BLUE model (Hansis et al., 2015), which are based on Houghton et al. (1983) and the assumption that harvest from shrub-lands can only be used for the purpose of fuel burning.”
- Vegetation demographics in Earth System Models: A review of progress and priorities (2018, background): “The 617 impact of gross land use transitions has been estimated to generate emissions that are 15-40% 618 higher than the net transitions alone (Hansis et al., 2015; Stocker et al., 2014; Wilkenskjeld et al., 619 2014).”
- Unexpectedly large impact of forest management and grazing on global vegetation biomass (2017, unknown): “There are large uncertainties for these two components, but their effects are generally estimated to be small in comparison to biomass changes 12,21 .”
- A review of trends and drivers of greenhouse gas emissions by sector from 1990 to 2018 (2021, methodology): “BLUE emission estimates (Hansis et al 2015) are globally higher than the Houghton and Nassikas (HN) (2017) model, in part driven by the explicit representation of land-use transitions at the sub-grid scale in BLUE and the preferential allocation of pasture on nat-ural grassland in HN (Hansis et al…”
- Role of forest regrowth in global carbon sink dynamics (2019, background): “By contrast, for soils and litter we find losses, rather than increases, in stocks, with a loss of 9 (8-17) Pg C relating to decomposition of litter following disturbances (see SI Appendix, Fig.”