IoTPOT: Analysing the Rise of IoT Compromises

By Y. Pa, Shogo Suzuki, K. Yoshioka, Tsutomu Matsumoto, Takahiro Kasama, Christian Rossow. Workshop on Offensive Technologies, 2015

343 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

ContexloT: Towards Providing Contextual Integrity to Appified IoT Platforms (2017, unknown): “image; Unprotected debugging interface [53], [69], [12] N/A”
The Effect of IoT New Features on Security and Privacy: New Threats, Existing Solutions, and Challenges Yet to Be Solved (2018, background): “[48] designed honeypot and sandbox system to collect attack samples from IoT devices, and found the most remote”
Sonata: query-driven streaming network telemetry (2018, background): “Consider the problem of detecting the spread of malware via telnet [35], which is a common tactic targeting IoT devices [1].”
A Review of Intrusion Detection Systems Using Machine and Deep Learning in Internet of Things: Challenges, Solutions and Future Directions (2020, background): “Authors further claim that none of these binaries could have been detected by existing honeypots that handle the Telnet protocol, such as telnet password honeypot and honeyd, because these honeypots are not capable of handling different incoming commands initiated by the attackers [210].”