Getting into Shape: An Empirical Comparison of Traditional Truss-Based Morphometric Methods with a Newer Geometric Method Applied to New World Cichlids

By K. Parsons, B. Robinson, T. Hrbek. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 2003

138 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Geometry and Topology, Paleontology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/09d734c03c93e84396a8a0f3985df15eb09af5ef

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. M. Zimmerman
2. R. Eshenroder
3. C. Krueger

In Geometry and Topology

1. R. Eshenroder
2. C. Krueger
3. M. Zimmerman

In Paleontology

1. R. Eshenroder
2. C. Krueger
3. M. Zimmerman

Citations in the corpus

• Phenotypic Diversity of Lake Trout in Great Slave Lake: Differences in Morphology, Buoyancy, and Habitat Depth (2006, methodology): “Body shapes were measured as two-dimensional geometric forms and compared using landmark-based geometric morphometrics ( Bookstein 1991 ; Parsons et al.”
• Dealing with allometry in linear and geometric morphometrics: a taxonomic case study in the Leporinus cylindriformis group (Characiformes: Anostomidae) with description of a new species from Suriname (2011, background): “…using sheared PCA, regression, or analysis of covariance (Bookstein et al., 1985; Fink & Zelditch, 1995; Chernoff & Machado-Allison, 1999; Rincon, 2000; Fernandes et al., 2002; Parsons et al., 2003; Chernoff & Machado-Allison, 2005; Sidlauskas, Chernoff & Machado-Allison, 2006), many do not.”