On the origin of southern African subtropical thicket vegetation

By Richard M. Cowling, Ş. Procheş, J. Vlok, J. van Staden. 2005

120 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The origin and affinities of southern African subtropical thicket have been misunderstood and neglected. This formation was only recognised as a biome distinct from savanna and karoo in the mid 1990s. One hypothesis states that it is a young vegetation type, assembled from forest, savanna and karoo elements after Holocene climatic amelioration. Others have suggested an ancient history for thicket. Here we review fossil and phylogenetic data in order to provide a better assessment of the origins of thicket. Albeit patchy, the fossil data are suggestive of a Palaeogene origin for this formation. A review of molecular phylogenetic data of extant thicket lineages indicated three major patterns: (i) ancient Cretaceous elements, including Encephalartos and the Strelitziaceae, (ii) basally branching lineages — many of which dominate contemporary thicket — that evolved in the Eocene (e.g. in the Celastraceae, Sapindaceae, Didiereaceae, Crassulaceae: Cotyledonoideae), and (iii) lineages derived from adjacent biomes that diversified in thicket in association with Neogene climatic deterioration (e.g. Aizoaceae, Asteraceae). We provide a narrative account of the evolution of thicket, which concludes that it is an ancient formation, extending back at least to the Eocene and derived initially from elements in the forest formations that prevailed in Upper Cretaceous and early Palaeogene times. As a biome, thicket is not uniquely southern African, being part of a formation that was globally widespread in the Eocene and which is extant in many parts of the world. Future research on the origins of thicket should focus on providing dates for major dichotomies as a complement to the rapid emergence of molecular phylogenies, as well as data on the genetic variation in populations of taxa categorised as ancient or young, and widespread or range-restricted.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Forestry, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/09d05ad70dfd644543b5fd48d9664b3c235aa0bc

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Forestry

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

The evolution of African plant diversity (2014, background): “This flora, which is currently quite fragmented, would benefit from detailed exploration (Cowling et al., 2005; Schrire et al., 2005a).”
OCBIL theory: towards an integrated understanding of the evolution, ecology and conservation of biodiversity on old, climatically buffered, infertile landscapes (2009, background): “Only the subdued flat landscape of the Southwest Australian Floristic Region is of comparable age and greater climatic stability (Cowling et al. 2005a) and also has experienced prolonged absence of glaciation, but the Australian deserts are of mid-late Tertiary age (Hopper 2005; Byrne et al. 2008),…”
Cascading biodiversity and functional consequences of a global change–induced biome switch (2012, background): “2, see also Cowling et al., 2005).”
Niche‐based modelling as a tool for predicting the risk of alien plant invasions at a global scale (2005, background): “90% of correct predictions, reflecting difficulties in conceptualizing this biome in climatic terms (Cowling et al., 2005; Mucina & Rutherford, 2005).”