Cognitive‐behavioural treatment for imprisoned offenders: An evaluation of HM Prison Service's cognitive skills programmes

By C. Friendship, L. Blud, M. Erikson, Rosie Travers, D. Thornton. 2003

107 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

How effective is the “Reasoning and Rehabilitation” programme in reducing reoffending? A meta-analysis of evaluations in four countries (2006, methodology): “Offenders in the treatment and control conditions could be matched on their individual risk levels (Andrews et al. , 1990; Friendship et al., 2003; Raynor, Kynch, Roberts & Merrington, 2000).”
The impact of corrections on re-offending: A review of 'what works': Home Office research study 291 (2005, background): “These are re f e rred to as non-reconviction benefits and these outcomes can also provide a better understanding of how interventions work (Friendship et al., 2003a).”
Evaluating offending behaviour programmes (2008, methodology): “The designs used by Friendship et al. (2003), Hollin et al. (2004) and Palmer et al. (2007) are referred to by Wilson et al. (2005) as ‘high-quality quasi-experimental’, in contrast to ‘low-quality quasi-experimental’, designs.”