Diagnostic performance of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with suspected acute myocarditis: comparison of different approaches.
By H. Abdel-Aty, P. Boyé, Anja Zagrosek, R. Wassmuth, Andreas Kumar, D. Messroghli, Petra Bock, R. Dietz, M. Friedrich, J. Schulz-Menger. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2005
782 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/09a2a9a7b9b6b7549c5a15bf0cc77aed860a9c1e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Citations in the corpus
- Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Nonischemic Myocardial Inflammation: Expert Recommendations. (2018, methodology): “Data for original Lake Louise Criteria from (15,20,40,58,60,66,67,112); data for T2 þ EGE and EGE þ LGE from (58); data for T2-weighted imaging þ LGE from (42,52,58); data for T2 map þ LGE from (52,66) and for T1 map þ LGE from (42,52,66,67,110); data for T2-weighted imaging and T1 map from (42,67);”
- Current state of knowledge on aetiology, diagnosis, management, and therapy of myocarditis: a position statement of the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Myocardial and Pericardial Diseases. (2013, methodology): “The combined use of three different CMR techniques is suggested (Table 5).(134,136) – 139 One study has demonstrated good correlation”