Supply of tree-holes limits nest density of cavity-nesting birds in primary and logged subtropical Atlantic forest

By K. Cockle, K. Martin, M. Drever. 2010

226 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0996d9eefec2bfd1d8b208284b92a121b18c913f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

In Ecology

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Seed dispersal in changing landscapes. (2012, background): “Small-scale extraction of large trees reduces the number of cavities available for nesting for some avian frugivore species (Cockle et al., 2010).”
Woodpeckers, decay, and the future of cavity-nesting vertebrate communities worldwide (2011, background): “may be unsuitable for wildlife (Cockle et al. 2010), and dead trees with many obvious cavities often indicate past rather than current or future resource availability (Aitken and Martin 2004).”
The diversity, distribution and conservation status of the tree‐cavity‐nesting birds of the world (2017, background): “…processes such as logging or forest clearing for agriculture or urbanization may lead to population declines that can endanger the persistence of intact tree- cavity- nesting communities (Politi et al., 2009; Politi, Hunter, & Rivera, 2010; Cockle et al., 2010; Wesołowski & Martin, in press).”
Linking fungi, trees, and hole-using birds in a Neotropical tree-cavity network: Pathways of cavity production and implications for conservation (2012, background): “At two sites in northern Argentina, logged forest supported 2–9 times fewer tree cavities and 17 times fewer nests than primary or mature forest, suggesting that current management may be inadequate to maintain populations and communities of cavity-nesting birds (Cockle et al., 2010; Politi et al., ”
Microclimate in tree cavities and nest-boxes: implications for hole-nesting birds (2017, background): “In the long term, the 397 retention of cavity-bearing trees is a more sustainable, cost-effective and less disruptive 398 measure (Goldingay and Stevens, 2009; Lindenmayer et al., 2009; Cockle et al., 2010; 399 Wesołowski and Martin, in press).”
Cavity characteristics, but not habitat, influence nest survival of cavity-nesting birds along a gradient of human impact in the subtropical Atlantic Forest (2015, background): “Populations of these cavity-nesters can be limited by the supply of suitable cavities, which usually occur in large old trees (Newton, 1994, 1998; Gibbons and Lindenmayer, 2002; Cockle et al., 2010, 2011a,b).”