An ethical approach to climate adaptation finance

By M. Grasso. 2010

145 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/097c0bd1907a9ad2e8e7b75a3b287d7e9414386b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. C. Betzold
2. S. Barrett
3. Florian Weiler
4. J. Roberts
5. R. Fyfe
6. C. Saunders
7. P. Dalziel
8. B. Newton

In Global and Planetary Change

1. Florian Weiler
2. C. Betzold
3. S. Barrett
4. J. Roberts
5. R. Fyfe
6. C. Saunders
7. B. Orlove
8. P. Dalziel

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Florian Weiler
2. C. Betzold
3. W. Pauw
4. S. Barrett
5. J. Roberts

Citations in the corpus

• Explaining differential vulnerability to climate change: A social science review (2018, background): “Each question raises issues of justice and equity in climate governance, including procedural justice and fair procurement and distribution of adaptation resources (Ciplet, Roberts, & Khan, 2015; Grasso, 2010).”
• Allocation of aid for adaptation to climate change: Do vulnerable countries receive more support? (2017, background): “…allocated, with most emphasizing the need for prioritizing vulnerable countries: adaptation aid should first and foremost support the vulnerable, and specifically those ‘‘particularly vulnerable’’ to climate change (e.g. Barr et al. 2010; Ciplet et al. 2013; DuusOtterström 2015; Grasso 2010a, b).”
• Local level climate justice? Adaptation finance and vulnerability reduction (2013, background): “…justice research is often located on the international scale, focusing on justice principles (Albin, 2001; Paterson, 2001), allocation criteria (Fermann, 1997; Baer et al., 2009), carbon markets (Caney, 2010; Page, 2012) and funding architectures (Grasso, 2010a, 2010b).”
• Conditional nationally determined contributions in the Paris Agreement: foothold for equity or Achilles heel? (2019, background): “There is widespread agreement among scholars and policy-makers that, as a matter of equity, support for adaptation should be prioritized for countries most vulnerable to climate change (Ciplet, Roberts, & Khan, 2015; Grasso, 2010; see also section 2.2 below).”
• Sustainable development and equity (2009, background): “Equitable burden sharing has been most frequently applied to costs of mitigation, though similar issues arise with regard to adaptation (Baer, 2006; Paavola and Adger, 2006; Adger, 2006; Jagers and Duus-Otterstrom, 2008; Dellink et al., 2009; Grasso, 2010; Hartzell-Nichols, 2011).”