A New Approach for Modelling Strategic Voting in Multiparty Elections

By Michael R. Alvarez, Jonathan Nagler. British Journal of Political Science, 2000

323 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations, Safety Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0974bda541e10e2e01552ab5774766a07c0b600c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Political Science and International Relations

In Safety Research

Citations in the corpus

Assessing the magnitude of the economic vote over time and across nations (2006, methodology): “The results summarized in this essay are based on Duch and Stevenson’s (2005) analysis of 163 voter preference surveys in 19 countries and over a 20-year period.”
Centripetal and Centrifugal Incentives under Different Electoral Systems (2011, background): “Expected seat-vote differences are anticipated by voters and parties, leading to strategic voting on the part of voters and, it follows, to new equilibrium adjustments by parties (Alvarez and Nagler 2000; Bawn 1999; Benoit et al. 2006; Cox 1997; Duverger 1954).”
Choosing between multinomial logit and multinomial probit models for analysis of unordered choice data (2007, methodology): “In the spirit of this argument, many researchers have used MNP to analyze their choice data without considering MNL (Alvarez et al 2000 and Schofield et al 1998, for example).”
Ecological Inference and Entropy-Maximizing: An Alternative Estimation Procedure for Split-Ticket Voting (2000, background): “[Johnston and Pattie (1991b), for example, used it to estimate the volume of tactical—or strategic—voting at the 1987 British general election; their estimate has recently been confirmed by Alvarez and Nagler (2000).] This paper has therefore set out the basic procedures involved, illustrated their ”
A Regression Discontinuity Test of Strategic Voting and Duverger's Law ∗ (2011, background): “This paper is also related to the literature measuring the extent of strategic voting, which includes small-scale laboratory experiments (surveyed in Rietz, 2008) and analysis of surveys that directly ask respondents about their preferences and votes (e.g., Alvarez and Nagler, 2000).”
Inferring Strategic Voting (2013, unknown): “Our paper focuses on the issue of strategic voting instead of strategic turnout, although it is conceptually 9See Alvarez and Nagler (2000), Blais, Nadeau, Gidengil, and Nevitte (2001) and papers cited therein.”