The Effectiveness of Cognitive Behavioral Treatment for Adult Offenders: A Methodological, Quality-Based Review

By L. C. Allen, D. Mackenzie, Laura J. Hickman. 2001

90 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A Quantitative Review of Structured, Group-Oriented, Cognitive-Behavioral Programs for Offenders (2005, methodology): “Research reviews of cognitive-behavioral programs for offenders have also drawn favorable conclusions ( Allen, MacKenzie, & Hickman, 2001; MacKenzie & Hickman, 1998).”
The Development and Implementation of Dialectical Behavior Therapy in Forensic Settings (2004, background): “Allen, Mackenzie & Hickman (2001) reviewed another set of studies using two different types of CBT in correctional environments: one which focused on increasing moral reasoning and one designed to change criminogenic thoughts and attitudes.”
What Have We Learned from Five Decades of Neutralization Research? (2005, background): “Indirect evidence can be gleaned from evaluations of cognitive-based therapy in correctional and drug addiction treatment settings (Allen, MacKenzie, and Hickman 2001).”
How effective is the “Reasoning and Rehabilitation” programme in reducing reoffending? A meta-analysis of evaluations in four countries (2006, methodology): “Allen et al. (2001) did not conduct a meta-analysis, and relied on the statistics provided by the authors in drawing conclusions about effectiveness.”