MEASURING FUTURE GRANDPARENTS' P REFERENCES FOR EQUALITY AND R ELATIVE S TANDING*

By Olof Johansson-Stenman, Fredrik Carlsson, Dinky Daruvala. 2002

394 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0967114cd4f5a9ebff20ea197fea067f4865570e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Gender Studies

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Attitudes to Income Inequality: Experimental and Survey Evidence (2014, methodology): “1200 Handbook of Income Distribution”
Empirical Social Choice: Questionnaire-Experimental Studies on Distributive Justice (2011, background): “Recently Jungeilges and Theisen (2010) undertook an econometric analysis on the various decision patterns that are possible in the given situation (they expanded their investigation to other situations with the same pattern of decision sequences as in Gaertner, 1992).”
Will GDP Growth Increase Happiness in Developing Countries? (2011, background): “An alternative approach is to ask individuals to choose between hypothetical outcomes, as in Alpizar et al. (2005), Johannsson-Stenman et al. (2002) and Solnick and Hemenway (1998).”
Toward a new welfare economics for sustainability (2005, background): “Johansson-Stenman et al. (2002) found that, not only are people averse to inequality, risk and a decline in relative standing, the social marginal utility of income may turn negative even at nonextreme income levels.”
Choosing the Joneses: Endogenous Goals and Reference Standards (2004, neutral): “…reference standards will be, i.e., ∂g ∗ i ∂θ < 0 (see section 4.1. and appendix).17 Suggestive evidence in favor of this interpretation comes from the study by Johansson-Stenman et al. (2002) who find that female respondents have a higher concern for relative standing than males (ibd., Table 7).”
When the Joneses’ consumption hurts : Optimal public good provision and nonlinear income taxation (2008, background): “Johansson-Stenman et al. (2002) and define the degree of positionality for ability-type i, based on the utility function in Eq. (1), as follows:”
Conformity and the Demand for Environmental Goods (2010, neutral): “consumption (Alpizar et al., 2005; Johansson-Stenman et al., 2002; Solnick and Hemenway,”
Relative Concerns of Rural-to-Urban Migrants in China (2012, background): “…(e.g., Clark and Oswald, 1996; McBride, 2001; Ferrer-i-Carbonell, 2005; Luttmer, 2005; Senik, 2004, 2008; Pérez-Asenjo, 2010; see also the survey of Clark et al., 2008) or tailor-made survey experiments (e.g., Solnick and Hemenway 1998; Johansson-Stenman et al., 2002; Alpizar et al., 2005).”