An open source chemical structure curation pipeline using RDKit

By A. P. Bento, Anne Hersey, Eloy Felix, Gregory A. Landrum, Anna Gaulton, Francis Atkinson, L. Bellis, M. D. Veij, Andrew R. Leach. Journal of Cheminformatics, 2020

673 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Background The ChEMBL database is one of a number of public databases that contain bioactivity data on small molecule compounds curated from diverse sources. Incoming compounds are typically not standardised according to consistent rules. In order to maintain the quality of the final database and to easily compare and integrate data on the same compound from different sources it is necessary for the chemical structures in the database to be appropriately standardised. Results A chemical curation pipeline has been developed using the open source toolkit RDKit. It comprises three components: a Checker to test the validity of chemical structures and flag any serious errors; a Standardizer which formats compounds according to defined rules and conventions and a GetParent component that removes any salts and solvents from the compound to create its parent. This pipeline has been applied to the latest version of the ChEMBL database as well as uncurated datasets from other sources to test the robustness of the process and to identify common issues in database molecular structures. Conclusion All the components of the structure pipeline have been made freely available for other researchers to use and adapt for their own use. The code is available in a GitHub repository and it can also be accessed via the ChEMBL Beaker webservices. It has been used successfully to standardise the nearly 2 million compounds in the ChEMBL database and the compound validity checker has been used to identify compounds with the most serious issues so that they can be prioritised for manual curation.

Subfields: Cancer Research, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Pharmacology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0956b0fa3f860992e3def8ee7ee7afacd4207405

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computational Theory and Mathematics

  1. Kenneth Atz
  2. José Jiménez-Luna
  3. Gisbert Schneider
  4. Clemens Isert
  5. Anna Gaulton
  6. Francesca Grisoni
  7. Roderick E. Hubbard
  8. Markus Hartenfeller

In Pharmacology

  1. Gisbert Schneider

Citations in the corpus