A TEST OF THE TREELINE CARBON LIMITATION HYPOTHESIS BY IN SITU CO2 ENRICHMENT AND DEFOLIATION
By I. T. Handa, C. Körner, S. Hättenschwiler. 2005
153 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change, Plant Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/09569ac2467b6d12c64cc326b9e7fc4f6d74b264
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Atmospheric Science
In Global and Planetary Change
In Plant Science
Citations in the corpus
- Plant CO2 responses: an issue of definition, time and resource supply. (2006, background): “(c) The Swiss treeline FACE, where isolated trees (expanding canopy) are growing under strong below ground competition with a steady state dwarf shrub heath (Handa et al., 2005).”
- Fast replenishment of initial carbon stores after defoliation by the pine processionary moth and its relationship to the re-growth ability of trees (2012, unknown): “For pine trees, removal of up to 80 % of leaves has been shown to have no significant impact on the lateral branch growth of trees (Handa et al. 2005).”
- Species‐specific tree growth responses to 9 years of CO2 enrichment at the alpine treeline (2010, background): “…responsiveness for the two species could not be explained by the photosynthetic response, as both Larix andPinus experienced strong photosynthetic stimulation in the first 3-treatment years (Handa et al. 2005) that persisted in the final year of CO2 enrichment (K. Streit, personal communication).”
- A test of the growth-limitation theory for alpine tree line formation in evergreen and deciduous taxa of the eastern Himalayas (2008, unknown): “This contrasts responses of (c. 35-years-old) L. decidua in the European Alps which showed enhanced radial stem growth and annual shoot increment in response to 4 years of free air CO2 enrichment at tree line (Handa et al. 2005, 2006).”
- Growth and phenology of mature temperate forest trees in elevated CO2 (2006, background): “…arise from pronounced interspecific variation (i.e. species responded very differently to elevated CO2 for unknown reasons (Norby, 1996; Körner, 2000; Tangley, 2001; Craine et al., 2003; Handa et al., 2005, Körner, 2005)), and even genotypic differences are possible (Wang et al., 2000).”
- Tree species diversity affects canopy leaf temperatures in a mature temperate forest (2007, background): “2, Table 1 and Keel et al., 2007; Sellin and Kupper, 2004; Handa et al., 2005; Willert et al., 1995).”