Is it “Sex”?: College students' interpretations of sexual behavior terminology

By L. Bogart, H. Cecil, D. Wagstaff, S. Pinkerton, P. Abramson. 2000

112 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Gender Studies, General Health Professions

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/095005485c6175fc690315c15e319251b710b6a2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. R. Jordan-Young
2. Raffaella Ida Rumiati
3. E. S. Byers

In Gender Studies

1. R. Jordan-Young
2. Raffaella Ida Rumiati
3. E. S. Byers

In General Health Professions

1. R. Jordan-Young
2. Raffaella Ida Rumiati
3. E. S. Byers

Citations in the corpus

• WHAT IS SEX? STUDENTS' DEFINITIONS OF HAVING SEX, SEXUAL PARTNER, AND UNFAITHFUL SEXUAL BEHAVIOUR (2003, background): “For example, orgasm may increase feelings of intimacy toward the person and thereby increase the likelihood that a behaviour is counted as sex (Bogart et al, 2000; Sanders & Reinisch, 1999).”
• Hardwired for Sexism? Approaches to Sex/Gender in Neuroscience (2012, background): “context interpret “having sex” to be synonymous with penilevaginal intercourse [15, 16]).”