On Decomposing the Causes of Health Sector Inequalities with an Application to Malnutrition Inequalities in Vietnam

By A. Wagstaff, E. Doorslaer, Naoko Watanabe. 2001

1,115 citations recorded by the source corpus.

A method for decomposing inequalities in the health sector into their causes is developed and applied to data on child malnutrition in Vietnam. Wagstaff, van Doorslaer, and Watanabe propose a method for decomposing inequalities in the health sector into their causes, by coupling the concentration index with a regression framework. They also show how changes in inequality over time, and differences across countries, can be decomposed into the following: - Changes due to changing inequalities in the determinants of the variable of interest. - Changes in the means of the determinants. - Changes in the effects of the determinants on the variable of interest. The authors illustrate the method using data on child malnutrition in Vietnam. They find that inequalities in height-for-age in 1993 and 1998 are accounted for largely by inequalities in household consumption and by unobserved influences at the commune level. And they find that an increase in such inequalities is accounted for largely by changes in these two influences. In the case of household consumption, rising inequalities play a part, but more important have been the inequality - increasing effects of rising average consumption and the increased protective effect of consumption on nutritional status. In the case of unobserved commune-level influences, rising inequality and general improvements seem to have been roughly equally important in accounting for rising inequality in malnutrition. This paper - a joint product of Public Services for Human Development, Development Research Group, and the Development Data Group - is part of a larger effort in the Bank to investigate the links between health and poverty. The authors may be contacted at awagstaff@worldbank.org, vandoorslaer@econ.bmg.eur.nl., or nwatanabe@worldbank.org.

Subfields: Nutrition and Dietetics, Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/094c7288ea822cabc22348f26e89581618d2b705

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Nutrition and Dietetics

1. Andrew M. Jones
2. Adam Wagstaff
3. E. van Doorslaer
4. X. Koolman
5. G. Turati
6. V. Oppedisano

In Safety Research

1. Andrew M. Jones
2. Adam Wagstaff
3. E. van Doorslaer
4. X. Koolman
5. G. Turati
6. V. Oppedisano

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Andrew M. Jones
2. Adam Wagstaff
3. E. van Doorslaer
4. G. Erreygers
5. X. Koolman
6. G. Turati
7. V. Oppedisano

Citations in the corpus

• What are the causes of educational inequalities and of their evolution over time in Europe? Evidence from PISA (2010, positive): “In particular - following the same methodology proposed by Wagstaff et al. (2003) – we decompose change in educational inequalities on standardised tests into shares due to changes in the means and inequalities of the determinants of educational outcomes, and changes due to the rate of return of…”
• Explaining income-related inequalities in doctor utilisation in Europe. (2004, methodology): “Third, by coupling the measurement framework with an explanatory framework it allows for a decomposition ‘by factors’ of inequality and inequity [6].”
• Poverty and health sector inequalities. (2002, methodology): “The contribution to inequality in health by a particular proximate determinant depends partly on its distribution across socioeconomic groups and partly on its impact on health (52).”
• Correcting the concentration index. (2009, background): “Given that as = 0 we can also infer the bounds of the ill health Concentration Index: (bs s) bs C(s) +s s) bs (12)”