Land Titling and Rural Transition in Vietnam
By Quy-Toan Do, Lakshmi Shankar Iyer. Economic development and cultural change, 2008
364 citations recorded by the source corpus.
We examine the impact of the 1993 Land Law of Vietnam, which gave households the power to exchange, transfer, lease, inherit, and mortgage their land‐use rights. We use household surveys before and after the law was passed, together with the considerable variation across provinces in the speed of implementation of the reform, to identify the impact of the law. We find that the additional land rights led to statistically significant increases in the share of total area devoted to long‐term crops and in labor devoted to nonfarm activities. However, these changes are not large in magnitude and appear to be driven mainly by the increased security of tenure provided by the law rather than by increased access to credit markets or greater land market participation.
Subfields: General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Soil Science, Urban Studies
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/094b61255c0fd10e42b9b033e4741b42b3ede06f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
In Soil Science
- K. Deininger
- B. K. Jack
- D. Ali
- D. Byerlee
- G. Feder
- Yana van der Meulen Rodgers
- Huong Nguyen
- Nidhiya Menon
In Urban Studies
Citations in the corpus
- Challenges posed by the new wave of farmland investment (2011, background): “The small and medium farmer-driven expansion of rice exports—and subsequently exports of other commodities with higher value added—in these countries indicates that these policies had a major impact on poverty reduction and gradual increases of farm size as non-agricultural growth accelerated as wel”
- Rising Global Interest in Farmland: Can It Yield Sustainable and Equitable Benefits? (2011, background): “A large effort to secure property rights after decollectivization expanded labor-intensive rice production as a basis for rapid poverty reduction and subsequent diversification of the rural economy into high-value exports and nonagricultural employment (Do and Iyer 2008; Pingali and Xuan 1992).”
- Non-Farm Activity, Household Expenditure, and Poverty Reduction in Rural Vietnam: 2002–2008 (2014, background): “The 1988 Land Law allocated land to households with 10–15 years of secure tenure, during which households had the right to own the agricultural output after paying taxes and commissions to the collectives (Do & Iyer, 2008; Pingali & Vo-Tong, 1992).”
- Vulnerability and poverty dynamics in Vietnam (2011, background): “This was partly due to the relatively equitable redistribution of agricultural land among rural households as well as high levels of education and standards of literacy and numeracy, which enabled them to respond to any change taking place during the shift to a market economy, such as the increased ”
- Industrial land development in urban villages in China: A property rights perspective (2014, background): “…investment incentives by reducing expropriation risk, whereas weak protection of land property rights leads to low investment (Alston, Libecap, & Schneider, 1996; Besley, 1995; Brasselle, Gaspart, & Platteau, 2002; Deininger & Jin, 2006; Do & Iyer, 2008; Galiani, 2010; Goldstein & Udry, 2008).”
- Market inefficiencies and the adoption of agricultural technologies in developing countries 1 (2013, background): “Expanding formal property rights is associated with increased investment (Do and Iyer 2003).”
- Environmental and Gender Impacts of Land Tenure Regularization in Africa: Pilot Evidence from Rwanda (2011, background): “In Vietnam, awarding certificates prompted higher investment in perennials and prompted households, especially the poor, to spend more time in non-agricultural activities (Do and Iyer 2008).”
- Impacts of land certification on tenure security, investment, and land markets: evidence from Ethiopia (2008, background): “…award of certificates is estimated to not only have prompted investment in perennials (by 7.5% compared to no certificates) but also an 11-12 week expansion of the time households spent in non-agricultural activity, an effect that was particularly pronounced for the poor (Do and Iyer 2008).”
- Women’s Land Rights and Children’s Human Capital in Vietnam (2014, background): “1 In the case of Vietnam, the 1993 Land Law prompted one of the largest land-titling programs seen to date in the developing world both in terms of scope and pace of implementation; within seven years, rural households were issued about 11 million land-use certificates (Do and Iyer 2008).”
- The context of REDD+ in Vietnam: drivers, agents and institutions. (2012, background): “While the process of issuing LURCs to millions of land users progressed with impressive speed and without obvious signs of widespread abuse by local authorities in the 1990s (Do and Iyer 2008), the process is now widely perceived as seriously compromised by corruption (World Bank 2009, Markussen and”
- Gender Equality, Poverty and Economic Growth (2007, methodology): “In the latter study, Orlando et al. simulates the impact of increased female labor force participation on rates of household poverty, endogenizing wages as a function of labor force participation rates.”
- The impact of land property rights interventions on investment and agricultural productivity in developing countries: a systematic review (2017, background): “At the most individualised end of the spectrum is the allocation of formal titles to individual landholders, through registration on a national cadastre (Foltz, Larson, and Lopez 2000; on Nicaragua, Ali, Deininger, and Goldstein 2011; on Rwanda, Do and Iyer 2007; on Vietnam).”
- Land Registration, Governance, and Development : Evidence and Implications for Policy (2009, background): “In addition to awarding about 11 million land use certificates (LUCs) through land registration efforts in the 1993–2000 period, legal changes in Vietnam during the same period also expanded users’ rights to include transfer, inheritance, exchange, lease, and mortgage (Do and Iyer 2008).”