Policy windows, ambiguity and Commission entrepreneurship: explaining the relaunch of the European Union's economic reform agenda

144 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Unexpected Winner of the Crisis: The European Commission’s Strengthened Role in Economic Governance (2014, background): “…case in point: it can convincingly be argued that the Commission has remained rather cautious during the early phases of crisis response (see also Copeland and James 2014), but such a narrow analytical focus runs the risk of underestimating this institution’s overall importance and thereby…”
Governing through financial markets: Towards a critical political economy of Capital Markets Union (2018, background): “…market development and integration, the Commission has seen its role further strengthened by the euro crisis (Bauer and Becker, 2014; Nugent and Rhinard, 2016), acting as a key policy entrepreneur with regard to the EU’s economic governance reform agenda (Copeland and James, 2014; Schmidt, 2016).”
Harnessing theories of the policy process for analysing the politics of sustainability transitions: A critical survey (2017, background): “The MSA has been criticised for its lack of testable hypotheses and the claim of the three streams being independent (Cairney and Jones, 2016; Copeland and James, 2014; Robinson and Eller, 2010).”