Do Nash values have value? Discussion and alternate proposals

By R. Criss, W. Winston. 2008

294 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

From R-squared to coefficient of model accuracy for assessing "goodness-of-fits" (2020, background): “…on the modelers' radar for decades (see, for instance, Garrick et al.(1978), Martinec and Rango (1989), Legates and McCabe (1999), Krause et al.(2005), Criss and Winston (2008), Le Moine (2008), Gupta et al. (2009), Ehret and Zehe (2011), Legates and McCabe (1999), and Legates and McCabe (2013)).”
Model Performance Sensitivity to Objective Function during Automated Calibrations (2012, methodology): “…(2) using other efficiency criteria that are modified to lessen oversensitivity of NSE to peak flows (Legates and McCabe 1999; Krause et al. 2005; Criss and Winston 2008); and (3) evaluating and reporting model performance using multiple efficiency criteria including the NSE (Legates and McCabe…”
Decomposition of the mean squared error and NSE performance criteria: Implications for improving hydrological modelling (2009, background): “(2006) proposed a bounded version of NSE and Criss and Winston (2008) proposed a volumetric”