Landscape‐level vegetation recovery from herbivory: progress after four decades of invasive red deer control

By Andrew J. Tanentzap, L. Burrows, William G. Lee, G. Nugent, J. Maxwell, David A. Coomes. 2009

148 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Restoring forest herb communities through landscape-level deer herd reductions: Is recovery limited by legacy effects? (2010, background): “…of plant communities across areas of varying ungulate density (Balgooyen and Waller, 1995; Augustine and Frelich, 1998; Gill and Morgan, 2010), and contrasts between historic and contemporary surveys (Potvin et al., 2003; Rooney et al., 2004; Taverna et al., 2005; Tanentzap et al., 2009).”
When does invasive species removal lead to ecological recovery? Implications for management success (2018, background): “For example, invasive populations of Cervus elaphus (red deer), even at small populations can devastate native tree communities and need to be completely removed to allow for recovery (Tanentzap et al. 2009).”
Interactions between white-tailed deer density and the composition of forest understories in the northern United States (2017, background): “Tree seedling recruitment for palatable species can be less successful in areas with high browse pressure (Tanentzap et al., 2009; Larouche et al., 2010; Palik et al., 2015), presenting a challenge to managing healthy and diverse forests.”