Inequality: Methods and Tools
By J. Litchfield. 1999
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Nina Grgic-Hlaca
- Adrian Weller
- Krishna P. Gummadi
- Hoda Heidari
- Luca Oneto
- Muhammad Bilal Zafar
- Till Speicher
- Brian Goesling
Citations in the corpus
- A Unified Approach to Quantifying Algorithmic Unfairness: Measuring Individual &Group Unfairness via Inequality Indices (2018, background): “Borrowing insights from the rich body of work on the axiomatic characterization of inequality indices in economics and social science [3, 10, 19, 24, 25, 28, 34], we argue that many axioms satisfied by inequality indices are appealing properties for measures of algorithmic unfairness.”
- Is It All About the Tails? The Palma Measure of Income Inequality (2013, unknown): “Litchfield (1999) expresses these as follows:2 some high-income countries in particular.”
- Inequality, credit and financial crises (2016, background): “Generally speaking, a major concern when studying the effects of inequality is the dependence of outcomes on the specific measure of inequality employed (Litchfield, 1999).”
- Accounting for the Recent Decline in Global Income Inequality1 (2004, background): “Income is measured as gross domestic product (GDP) per capita, calibrated across countries with purchasing power parity (PPP) converters, and expressed in constant 1996 U.S. dollars. effect (Litchfield 1999).”
- Disproportionality Measures of Concentration, Specialization, and Localization (2008, methodology): “In contrast to the RMD, the GE measures can be derived from a set of axioms that define several useful properties (see, e.g., Cowell 1995; Litchfield 1999).”