The influence of Mimulus ringens floral display size on pollinator visitation patterns

By R. Mitchell, J. D. Karron, Karsten G. Holmquist, J. M. Bell. 2004

274 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/09052452ded9e7422c62933699a83278c2c23b24

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. Martin Hermy
2. Lawrence D. Harder
3. J. D. Karron
4. R. Mitchell
5. J. M. Bell
6. H. Jacquemyn
7. S. Richards
8. Jon Ågren

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. Martin Hermy
2. Lawrence D. Harder
3. J. D. Karron
4. R. Mitchell
5. H. Jacquemyn
6. J. M. Bell
7. S. Richards
8. Jon Ågren

In Plant Science

1. Lawrence D. Harder
2. J. D. Karron
3. R. Mitchell
4. Martin Hermy
5. H. Jacquemyn
6. J. M. Bell
7. Jon Ågren
8. R. Brys

Citations in the corpus

• Beyond floricentrism: The pollination function of inflorescences (2004, methodology): “Data were collected from the literature (Pyke 1978; Augspurger 1980; Geber 1985; Andersson 1988; Schmid-Hempel & Speiser 1988; Klinkhamer et al. 1989; Pleasants & Zimmerman 1990; Barrett et al. 1994; Robertson & Macnair 1995; Brody & Mitchell 1997; Goulson et al. 1998; Ohashi & Yahara 1998; Johnson ”
• Effects of floral display size and plant density on pollinator visitation rate in a natural population of Digitalis purpurea (2005, unknown): “These countervailing factors have in most studies resulted in a constant relationship between display size and flower visitation rate (e.g. Robertson & Macnair 1995; Goulson et al. 1998; Ohashi & Yahara 2002; Mitchell et al. 2004), whereas in D.”
• INTERSPECIFIC COMPETITION FOR POLLINATION LOWERS SEED PRODUCTION AND OUTCROSSING IN MIMULUS RINGENS (2005, methodology): “We genotyped 10 randomly selected seedlings from each progeny array using the tissue extraction and electrophoretic methods of Karron et al. (2004).”
• Pollination efficiency and reproductive patterns in relation to local plant density, population size, and floral display in the rewarding Listera ovata (Orchidaceae) (2008, result): “This is in accordance with previous studies (for example, Klinkhamer & de Jong, 1990; Mitchell, 1994; Brys et al., 2004; Mitchell et al., 2004; Kindlemann & Jersáková, 2006; Jacquemyn et al., 2008), which reported that pollinators generally prefer plants with a larger floral display, because they…”
• Pollinator-Mediated Selection on Floral Display and Spur Length in the Orchid Gymnadenia conopsea (2010, background): “Pollinator visitation rate is usually positively re- lated to visual display, and traits such as plant height (Lortie and Aarssen 1999), number of flowers (Mitchell et al. 2004), and flower size (Schemske and Ågren 1995; Armbruster et al. 2005) may influence pollinator attraction.”
• TESTING ECOLOGICAL THEORY USING THE INFORMATION‐THEORETIC APPROACH: EXAMPLES AND CAUTIONARY RESULTS (2005, background): “Numerous observational studies and experiments have tested these ideas (e.g., Klinkhamer and de Jong 1990, Kadmon 1992, Mitchell et al. 2004).”